As U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term reaches the 100-day mark, a clearer picture is emerging of his administration’s priorities, internal dynamics, and governing style. While many aspects mirror his first term, a key difference lies in his ambition to take “creative destruction” to new heights without laying the groundwork for reconstruction.
Domestically, President Trump has enacted significant downsizing of federal agencies, slashed expenditures, and reduced the domestic workforce. Internationally, the imposition of increased tariffs—rising by at least 10 percent—has left many allies unsettled. These moves are part of a broader pattern of disruption that has characterized his early days back in office.
The initial response has been far from positive. Economically, despite inheriting a relatively healthy economy—marked by declining inflation and low unemployment—the stock market plunged following the announcement of new tariffs. Markets have since been volatile as global trade tensions escalate. With unemployment ticking upward and consumer confidence waning, many Americans are growing pessimistic about the future.
Politically, approval ratings have declined across most groups. According to recent polls, only 40 percent of adults approve of President Trump’s performance. Even on immigration—a cornerstone of his platform—public support has dipped, with 53 percent disapproving of his handling of the issue.
Internationally, relationships with key allies have been strained. The administration had hoped for quick concessions in trade negotiations, but leaders like Japan’s Prime Minister have publicly resisted, signaling intentions to oppose U.S. efforts to form exclusive economic blocs. Trade partners are adjusting their strategies, with companies like Japanese automaker Subaru restructuring to avoid tariffs.
Meanwhile, policies aimed at scoring political points have met with organized opposition. Universities and corporations are pushing back against directives perceived as undermining diversity and inclusion. Student groups are actively protesting, and civil society is becoming increasingly vocal.
President Trump’s approach has also led to internal challenges. By prioritizing loyalty over expertise, the administration faces criticism over appointments and mistakes made by key officials. This has resulted in a chaotic governance style that, while grabbing headlines, may not serve long-term strategic interests.
Now that significant changes have been set in motion, there is little sign of a plan for reconstruction. Undoing existing policies and cutting budgets is straightforward; building sustainable programs and institutions is far more complex. Without a clear path toward rebuilding, questions arise about the effectiveness of a strategy centered on disruption alone.
As the global community watches and waits, only time will tell whether this approach will yield the results the administration envisions or if it will lead to greater challenges ahead.
