Have you ever wondered who makes the rules that govern our world? Lately, there’s a growing conversation about how the United States is shaping international norms to fit its own interests, potentially sidelining established international law.
International law is based on the idea that all nations are equal and should respect each other’s sovereignty. However, critics argue that the U.S. promotes a “rules-based international order” that allows it to prioritize its own values and interests over those of other countries.
Double Standards?
An example of this is how the U.S. supports territorial integrity and opposes secession in places like Ukraine and Georgia, but has backed self-determination movements in regions like Kosovo. This selective support raises questions about whether the principles are applied consistently or based on strategic interests.
Human-Centric vs. State-Centric Security
The U.S. often champions human rights and democratic values, sometimes intervening in other nations to promote these ideals. However, when other countries raise concerns about issues within the U.S., it’s often seen as interference. This imbalance suggests that some nations have more leeway than others in the international arena.
The Need for True Equality
Many believe that for international relations to be fair, all countries should adhere to the same rules without exceptions. Uniform rules help resolve disputes and maintain global stability. When powerful nations create separate sets of rules, it can lead to confusion and conflict.
Looking Forward
As the world becomes more interconnected, it’s crucial for all nations to engage in open dialogue and respect established international laws. This ensures that all countries, big or small, have a voice and can contribute to a more just and peaceful global community.
Reference(s):
How US replaced international law with its own twisted creation
cgtn.com
