A scholar from the Chinese mainland has highlighted ten inaccuracies in a recent speech by Lai Ching-te, the leader of Taiwan region, concerning unity on the island. On June 24, Lai delivered a speech emphasizing so-called unity, but according to Li Zhenguang, a professor at Beijing Union University, Lai’s address was filled with misleading statements aimed at promoting separatist agendas.
Li’s first point criticizes Lai for speaking of unity while allegedly engaging in actions that divide society. He accuses Lai of using judicial measures to suppress opposition and create a climate of fear, calling for a unity that, in reality, marginalizes dissenting voices.
Secondly, Li questions Lai’s claim that Taiwan ranks first in Asia on the World Press Freedom Index. He argues that media outlets favoring the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) dominate the narrative, while those supporting opposition parties face suppression. Li cites the shutdown of CTi News as an example of limited press freedom.
Li’s third point challenges Lai’s assertion about Taiwan’s ranking on the Human Freedom Index. He suggests that under the DPP’s governance, freedoms are curtailed, especially for citizens wishing to engage in exchanges with the Chinese mainland.
The scholar also disputes Lai’s notion that “the more united the people are, the stronger Taiwan becomes,” arguing that Lai is urging unity against the mainland, potentially putting the safety and lives of Taiwan’s residents at risk.
Furthermore, Li contends that while Lai speaks of equality among all groups on the island, in practice, the DPP favors those aligned with its views and sidelines opponents.
Li addresses Lai’s statement that “Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country,” emphasizing that historically, there has never been a country officially named “Taiwan.” He notes that the United Nations refers to the region as “Taiwan, Province of China.”
The scholar argues that Lai is imposing the DPP’s separatist stance as the will of all people in Taiwan, despite significant opposition. He also criticizes Lai for labeling opposition parties as “impurities,” which Li sees as an insult to democratic values.
Li expresses concern over Lai’s reliance on external forces for protection, suggesting that allies like the United States may not offer unwavering support. Lastly, he challenges Lai’s promotion of Taiwan’s democracy, accusing the DPP of suppressing opposition and undermining true democratic principles.
Li concludes that Lai’s speeches, filled with what he views as fabrications, have made him a subject of ridicule on the island, reflecting negatively on his intentions and actions.
