NATO member states are grappling with proposals to increase defense spending as economic challenges and differing priorities expose cracks in the alliance’s unity.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni announced on Monday that while Italy is committed to bolstering its defense capabilities, significant increases in defense spending will take time to implement. “These are important commitments that Italy intends to honor. We will not leave our country weak and unable to defend itself,” Meloni stated, highlighting the challenges for highly-indebted nations like Italy.
Discussions at the upcoming NATO summit are expected to focus on encouraging member nations to meet or exceed the existing defense spending target of 2% of their gross domestic product (GDP), with some allies advocating for higher commitments in response to emerging global threats.
Spain, for instance, has agreed to allocate 2.1% of its GDP to defense. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez affirmed, “Spain will need to allocate 2.1% of its GDP to acquire and maintain all the personnel, equipment, and infrastructure requested by the Alliance to address emerging threats and challenges. No more, no less.” Sanchez emphasized that Spain has no intention of committing to significantly higher levels beyond this threshold.
In contrast, some nations like Estonia are pushing for a more proactive stance. Estonia has announced plans to meet higher defense spending goals soon and is urging others to follow suit within the next few years.
Experts suggest that this divergence reflects deeper concerns about NATO’s cohesion and strategic direction. Stefan Wolff, a professor of international security at the University of Birmingham, commented, “If NATO cannot agree on its main purpose, then even well-funded forces will lack shared direction. Without unity, increased spending becomes just another political gesture to buy time.”
Li Haidong, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University, noted that increasing defense spending poses a significant challenge for European NATO members and might strain their economic and social development. “Expanding defense spending is a huge challenge… it’s a goal that is very difficult to achieve in the short term,” Li said. He added that the disagreements indicate that divisions within NATO are unlikely to ease and may continue to intensify.
The debate over defense spending highlights the balancing act member states face between fulfilling alliance commitments and addressing domestic economic concerns. As NATO grapples with emerging threats, the path forward requires not just increased funding but also renewed unity and strategic clarity.
(With input from agencies)
Reference(s):
Disunity in NATO: Member states split on push for 5% defense spending
cgtn.com








